A Fresh Look at the Drivers of Extreme Flooding

A new study in Science Advances finds that compounding effects of flood drivers can complicate and exacerbate the risk of extreme floods in watersheds around the world. DRI’s Guo Yu, Ph.D., assistant research professor of hydrometeorology, co-authored the research.

“This study demonstrates how machine learning can help disentangle the complex interactions of different flood drivers,” Yu says. “We found that extreme floods can be caused by a combination of drivers with moderate magnitudes, rather than a single driver with extreme magnitude. This emphasizes the importance of understanding each individual flood driver in future research.”

Halle /Germany (June 2013). According to the findings of the UFZ scientists, the Saale river is one of the rivers with a high flood complexity. Photo: André Künzelmann / UFZ

Read the full press release from UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research:

If rivers overflow their banks, the consequences can be devastating – just like the catastrophic floods in North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate of 2021 showed. In order to limit flood damage and optimise flood risk assessment, we need to better understand what factors can lead to extreme forms of flooding and to what extent. Using methods of explainable machine learning, researchers at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) have shown that floods are more extreme when several factors are involved in their development. The research was published in Science Advances.

The interaction of several factors plays an important role in the development of floods. If in a catchment floods are more extreme the more variables are involved, then this catchment has a high flood complexity. In Germany, the upper reaches of the Elbe, the Saale and the Moselle are examples of catchments with a high flood complexity. In contrast, the Havel and the Zusam (a tributary of the Danube) are examples of catchments with a low flood complexity.

There are several factors that play an important role in the development of floods: air temperature, soil moisture, snow depth, and the daily precipitation in the days before a flood. In order to better understand how individual factors contribute to flooding, UFZ researchers examined more than 3,500 river basins worldwide and analysed flood events between 1981 and 2020 for each of them. The result: precipitation was the sole determining factor in only around 25% of the almost 125,000 flood events. Soil moisture was the decisive factor in just over 10% of cases, and snow melt and air temperature were the sole factors in only around 3% of cases. In contrast, 51.6% of cases were caused by at least two factors. At around 23%, the combination of precipitation and soil moisture occurs most frequently.

However, when analysing the data, the UFZ researchers discovered that three – or even all four – factors can be jointly responsible for a flood event. For example, temperature, soil moisture, and snow depth were decisive factors in around 5,000 floods whilst all four factors were decisive in around 1,000 flood events. And not only that: “We also showed that flood events become more extreme when more factors are involved”, says Dr Jakob Zscheischler, Head of the UFZ Department “Compound Environmental Risks” and senior author of the article. In the case of one-year floods, 51.6% can be attributed to several factors; in the case of five- and ten-year floods, 70.1% and 71.3% respectively can be attributed to several factors. The more extreme a flood is, the more driving factors there are and the more likely they are to interact in the event generation. This correlation often also applies to individual river basins and is referred to as flood complexity.

The interaction of several factors plays an important role in the development of floods. If in a catchment floods are more extreme the more variables are involved, then this catchment has a high flood complexity. In Germany, the upper reaches of the Elbe, the Saale and the Moselle are examples of catchments with a high flood complexity. In contrast, the Havel and the Zusam (a tributary of the Danube) are examples of catchments with a low flood complexity. Credit: UFZ

According to the researchers, river basins in the northern regions of Europe and America as well as in the Alpine region have a low flood complexity. This is because snow melt is the dominant factor for most floods regardless of the flood magnitude. The same applies to the Amazon basin, where the high soil moisture resulting from the rainy season is often a major cause of floods of varying severity. In Germany, the Havel and the Zusam, a tributary of the Danube in Bavaria, are river basins that have a low flood complexity. Regions with river basins that have a high flood complexity primarily include eastern Brazil, the Andes, eastern Australia, the Rocky Mountains up to the US west coast, and the western and central European plains. In Germany, this includes the Moselle and the upper reaches of the Elbe. “River basins in these regions generally have several flooding mechanisms”, says Jakob Zscheischler. For example, river basins in the European plains can be affected by flooding caused by the combination of heavy precipitation, active snow melt, and high soil moisture.

However, the complexity of flood processes in a river basin also depends on the climate and land surface conditions in the respective river basin. This is because every river basin has its own special features. Among other things, the researchers looked at the climate moisture index, the soil texture, the forest cover, the size of the river basin, and the river gradient. “In drier regions, the mechanisms that lead to flooding tend to be more heterogeneous. For moderate floods, just a few days of heavy rainfall is usually enough. For extreme floods, it needs to rain longer on already moist soils”, says lead author Dr Shijie Jiang, who now works at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena.

The scientists used explainable machine learning for the analysis. “First, we use the potential flood drivers air temperature, soil moisture, and snow depth as well as the weekly precipitation – each day is considered as an individual driving factor – to predict the run-off magnitude and thus the size of the flood”, explains Zscheischler. The researchers then quantified which variables and combinations of variables contributed to the run-off of a particular flood and to which extent. This approach is referred to as explainable machine learning because it uncovers the predictive relationship between flood drivers and run-off during a flood in the trained model. “With this new methodology, we can quantify how many driving factors and combinations thereof are relevant for the occurrence and intensity of floods”, adds Jiang.

The findings of the UFZ researchers are expected to help predict future flood events. “Our study will help us better estimate particularly extreme floods”, says Zscheischler. Until now, very extreme floods have been estimated by extrapolating from less extreme floods. However, this is too imprecise because the individual contributing factors could change their influence for different flood magnitudes.

Publication:

Shijie Jiang, Larisa Tarasova, Guo Yu, Jakob Zscheischler (2024): Compounding effects in flood drivers challenge estimates of extreme river floods. Science Advances, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adl4005

Further information:

Dr. Shijie Jiang
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
sjiang@bgc-jena.mpg.de

Prof. Dr. Jakob Zscheischler
Head of UFZ Department Compound Environmental Risks
jakob.zscheischler@ufz.de

UFZ press office
Susanne Hufe
Phone: +49 341 235-1630
presse@ufz.de

You May Also Like…

DRI’s STEM Education Program Receives DOE Grant to Support Nevada’s Clean Energy Workforce Pipeline

DRI’s STEM Education Program Receives DOE Grant to Support Nevada’s Clean Energy Workforce Pipeline

DRI’s STEM Education Program has received a grant from the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management to support Nevada’s clean energy workforce pipeline. The nearly $2 million in funding will be used to prepare the next generation with the knowledge and technical skills needed for employment in fields such as clean energy, waste management, and environmental remediation.

Share This